Archive for the ‘Fun Projects’ Category

Inside Coach – Smart Ball IMU Based Technology

 

image

To all my fans, readers and supporters … I just wanted to share a new exciting project to which I dedicated my last few months of work. This project summarizes and is in a way the culmination of all my IMU research that I’ve done in the past few years. The idea of the project is simple, yet no one produced to date a comparable product that would be flexible and open enough to allow developers to build apps on top of it. Inside Coach is a smart ball technology that incorporates a IMU unit and processor as well as a wireless transceiver. The ball connects to your smart phone or device or computer. On the app side we’re developing a way for people to track their progress and share it with friends. In the first phase Inside Coach will be used by pro players and we’ll record data of certain type of ball kicks. In next stage this data will be fed into an expert system which will be able to analyze it and helped by a machine learning system become your personal coach inside your pocket. We don’t claim this will replace your real coach, don’t fire him yet ! However it will help you or even your real coach to understand better the physics behind a good kick and a bad kick and ultimately achieve repeatability while learning a sport. The philosophy behind this is that  anyone  can score a goal by chance, to become a pro player however you need to understand the factors that lead to it or the factors that make you fail. Yes, some people just have it in their blood, but even those people train and perfect their moves. As any pro player will tell you – talent alone is not enough!  Sometimes you’re so close but still  you’re missing something … but what ? Inside Coach will be able to answer those questions and help you succeed by providing you real time advices from our expert system  via a Bluetooth headset – like “Try more spin” , “Try less speed”, “Mind the 5mph sideways wind”. To some people sports is an art, to some it is magic, and don’t get me wrong – we want to keep all that! We hope that Inside Coach will bring the ball based sports (football, baseball, soccer , volleyball , hand ball , tennis , etc) to the next level. Inside Coach  is where technology meets sports and makes learning and perfecting a sport fun once again !  

Current prototype. All of our pieces put together.

At the time of this post we developed a workable prototype and a basic app used to stream data that is transferred wirelessly from the sensor to your device. However to turn this into  a manufacturable product and do more work on the app we need your support! Rather than seek private capital we decided to go the way of KickStarter and connect directly to people that will be using the product and are as much as we are excited by the technology that this product will bring along its path. This is because we want the development of this product to be dictated by YOU an not by some random banker that has no other interest than gaining money.

If you would like to find more about our journey and support us I invite you to visit the Inside Coach KickStarter page.

Thank you !

//starlino//

RC Crawler Truck as Robotic Platform: Part 1 – upscale from 1/8 size to ~ 1/5 conversion, now able to climb on stairs

 

A terrain robotic platform must be able to handle different environments and be able to go over obstacles. While looking for such a platform for an upcoming robotic project, I came across a specific class of RC models – CRAWLERS. RC Crawlers are characterized by the following:

– RC crawlers are usually slow (hence the name) but have high torque and are able to climb over obstacles
– Because they are slow their ESC has no latching brake in other words if you move in forward and then in reverse. With a traditional car ESC this will put the car in brake mode and you must move to neutral position and then again in reverse to actually go in reverse. This is not the case with crawlers, if you move the stick in reverse, there’s no brake that you have to reset by going in neutral – it goes in reverse right away. This is a good feature of ESC for a robotic transform.
– Crawler have flexible and tilting body and wheels to conform to the terrain.

To start my initial testing I picked one of these Crawlers (called MAD TORQUE by Exceed), this is a 4WD crawler with a nice modular design:

IMG_2101

The first problem I came across is that this crawler was not able to climb over standard stairs. If this robot will be used indoors it will need to climb over stairs. The problem – forward wheels are able to climb over first stair however the back wheels are too close and are unable to push the car further.

The solution I found is rather interesting and very easy to implement. Because of the its symmetrical design I was able to get spare parts and increase the body size in a snap:

image

If you use the box as reference you’ll see that the body is now longer. This was achieved by adding an additional pair of body frames that are connected with a repurposed battery bracket part (I tried to use spare parts from the model to keep same nice color).

Interestingly the canopy fitted perfectly over this enlarged mod:

image

So I am very happy with the results. It almost looks like this car was supposed to be like this. I purchased a 1/8 crawler and after this easy mod it now looks more like a 1/5 size.  The car is able to handle the stairs without a problem (see video for full demonstration).

Can’t wait to put some sensors into this and turn it into an actual robot !

P.S. yes I was tempted to add larger wheels to this, unfortunately the gears are not designed to handle them and they broke. I am fine with the small wheels anyways, they give more torque than the larger wheels with the tradeoff of slower speed.  To compensate for the slow speed I upgraded the battery from the stock 7.4V to a LiPo 3S (11.4V), the stock ESC handles it without a problem and not even getting too hot.

Hope this helps someone, happy RC modding !

Cheers,
-s

Introducing the QuadHybrid – a stable, maneuverable and cheap flying robotic platform

Introduction & Demo of the QuadHybrid Design

I’ve been experimenting for quite a while with different configurations of Multi-Copters and RC Helicopters, basically looking for a stable robotic platform that can be used for my machine vision or other sensor-enabled flying robotic projects. RC helicopters have been around for quite a while, however (with the exception of some 3-Channel helicopters) they are not easy to fly, not very stable and not too precise in maneuverability – in other words not exactly good match for a flying robot. Then came the quadcopters and everyone loved them, talked about them , and eventually wanted to or actually built one.  I built a few – and what I learned is that  they have a great lifting power, great maneuverability (basically equivalent to a 4ch or 6ch heli), however   they rely entirely and heavily on relatively expensive IMU sensors  to achieve this stability.  I a QuadCopter you basically have four “monster” motors on each beam than must be synchronized precisely. Because you’re controlling so much power with your IMU sensors – any small deviation or lack of callibration and your platform is no longer stable. That’s why the sensors are crucial in a quadcopter  – without them the quadcopter will not fly at all ! 

After many trial designs – my conclusion was that a suitable flying robotic platform must not rely too much (or at all) on its sensors to be stable while hovering. It must be mechanically symmetric, preferably with it’s center of mass in the center.  At the same time it must have the maneuverability  capabilities of a quadcopter –  and namely I wanted it to fly sideways, forward & back  and rotate around its axis. Although the solution I came up with might seem to some (including myself) a little strange  and out of the ordinary –  as turned out it flew surprisingly well , was very stable and maneuverable, and best of all – had a very low price tag due to the fact that it was easy to built from the off-the-shelf toy helicopter replacement parts.

Without further adieu – below is the picture of the machine that I called “QuadHybrid”:

image

My very first QuadHybrid prototype.

Below you can see some flying test video:

 

So What Exactly is a QuadHybrid ?

Let’s have a closer look at QuadHybrid’s pictures. A simple way to look at it is:  a co-axial helicopter on top of a quadcopter – it’s actually as simple as that.

In total QuadHybrid has 6 motors and 6 propellers (2 large one center from the helicopter + 4 small on each arm from the quadcopter).

The two large center propellers in the center consist of 2 heli-type blades – they provide all the lifting power needed. They spin in opposite directions to compensate for the yaw rotation introduced by any rotating propeller and are stabilized by an optional vertically mounted MEMS gyroscope  (the only sensor used in this design). The slight difference in speed of the top and bottom blades is used to control the desired yaw rotation.  Thus the center motors provide the throttle and yaw control of the QuadHybrid – in other words ability to fly up/down or rotate about its center vertical axis.

The four small rotors on the four arms are actually small tail motors from a 3ch helicopter, they provide the remaining maneuverability  functions – pitch/roll or – or in other words the ability to fly  forward & backwards or shift sideways  (right / left) . 

The resemblance to a quadcopter and a helicopter can be seen in the picture below where they are put side by side.

QuadHybrid_Origins

 

How Does a QuadHybrid Work and How to Build One

QuadHybrid has all the maneuverability of a 4 channel helicopter or a quadcopter (throttle, yaw, pitch and roll). A 3 channel helicopter as we know it – only has 3 controls (throttle, yaw and pitch). The problem with a co-axial 4CH helicopter for instance is that it relies on a swash plate and servos to achieve the pitch/roll control. Basically it is a servo mechanism for tilting the axis of rotation of the bottom rotor – it is not easy to fine tune and it needs frequent maintenance. A 3CH toy helicopters on the other hand relies on a tail rotor to achieve the pitch control – and this is one of the ideas I used for QuadHybrid – basically I multiplied the tail boom and rotor on a 3CH helicopter by four.

eh-ek-e303ra-7_3

This is how a typical 4CH helicopter is build. Please note that the bottom blade can be tilted by using 2 servos that tilt the swashplate. In the QuadHybrid design we are going to eliminate the servos and the swashplate and replace them with 4 small motors mounted on 4 arms (beams), just like on a quadcopter.

I built my QuadHybrid, from spare RC or “toy” heli  parts. They are widely available and thanks to the fact that manufactures copy each other in some cases bluntly, these parts are compatible in many cases  so I was able to mix-and-match. I took the electronics from a E-Sky Lama V3 helicopter  – that is a 4 channel heli so it has a swashplate and 2 servos to control the pitch and roll. Because I didn’t wanted the swashplate (the roll/pitch on QuadHybrid is controlled by the 4 small quadcopter style rotors), I used the frame and blades from another toy helicompter  – Syma S001 and I was able to fit the Esky motors into that frame which are bigger and more powerful than the S001 stock motors. 

To clarify the design let’s look at the guts of the E-Sky Lama V3 helicopter . I actually used all electronics in this 4CH helicopter, except the servos (as will become clearer in the next diagram):

lama_v3_electronics

 

The main idea of the QuadHybrid design is: to achieve a better Pitch/Roll  control I replaced the servos with a custom control board called “QuadHybrid Controller V1”. This board basically takes the servo RC signals (Pitch and Yaw) as inputs and controls the 4 arm motors using a set of 4 transistors. This allows QuadHybrid to fly just like a quadcopter in “+”  or “X”  configurations (for explanation of “+” or “X”  flying configurations  see for example http://technicaladventure.blogspot.com/2012/09/quadcopter-stabilization-control-system.html).

 

QuadHybrid_electronics

 

On the mechanical part – the swashplate on the bottom blade was replaced with a fixed blade mount from a 3CH helicopter. This made the bottom blade of the 4CH fixed. Normally on a 4CH heli it is being tilted by servos that are connected to the swashplate using 2 links.

Main Rotor Head

This is a swashplate assembly on a 4Ch helicopter it is the black disk under the blades mount. It is connected to the blade mount with two links. Two servos that are controlled by the RC receiver are able to tilt the swashplate and thus alter the axis of rotation of the bottom blade. This is how the roll and pitch is controlled in a 4 channel helicopter. It is far from perfect and requires frequent tune-ups.

 

A gyro-stabilized co-axial 3 channel toy helicopter is fairly stable, as opposed to a 4CH helicopter- it uses the tail rotor to control the pitch (flying forward or backward). Note the bottom blade is fixed , just like on the QuadHybrid.

QuadHybrid Controller Board and Software

Below is the schematic of the QuadHybrid V1 controller (the blue board on the diagram above that controls the 4 motors). This is the only custom component that is not available from RC toys parts.

image

At the heart of the QuadHybrid V1 controller board is a PIC16F1825 microcontroller – it’s main task is to capture the servo signals received on ports RA5(ROLL) and RA4(PITCH) and convert them  to 4 PWM signals that control the 4 rotors mounted on arms. The motors are driven using 4 NPN transistors – these can be any NPN transistors as long as they have a current rating of at least 1A (or the maximum current of your arm-mounted motors) and a low Collector-Emitter resistance (< 0.3Ohm or so).  MOSFET could be used instead of NPN transistors, with slight schematic change – however I found hard to source them in an easy to solder and light-weight TO-92 package so I used NPNs instead.

QuadHybrid V1 controller board operates by default in “+” configuration. If you want to operate it in “X” configuration then connect the X_CONF jumper – this will give you better control with smaller motors , since for example flying forward will activate two motors at once (3 & 2). The only thing to keep in mind when flying in “X” configuration is that the “Front” is a imaginary line between arm #0 and #1 .

QuadHybrid V1 PCB was created as a all through-hole design so that anyone can assemble it and covert a toy RC helicopter into a QuadHybrid:

http://uploads.oshpark.com/uploads/project/top_image/BaiOVPXQ/thumb_i.png

For anyone wishing to spend time on creating their own QuadHybrid V1 controller board – source code and Eagle files are available on the SVN repository, otherwise easy to solder kits will be available in my Store.

If you would like just to peak over the source code here is a direct link:

https://code.google.com/p/quadhybrid-v1/source/browse/trunk/%20quadhybrid-v1/src/main.c

As you can see it is a fairly simple project a(for anyone familiar with C  and microcontrollers) and a good placeholder for further improvements and add-ons.

 

Mechanical Construction

On top of QuadHybrid prototype is basically a stripped down frame of a 3ch helicopter and namely it comes from Syma S001:

image

 

Under the frame are 2 aluminum tubing pieces that form the 4 arms. At the end of each arm I attached a tail rotor from the same Syma S001 helicopter model:

image

 

Then, to house all the electronics and battery I just sandwiched two perforated  boards with nylon spacers (Tip: most bolts,nuts and spacers used in this design are nylon-made to lower the weight) :

image

For landing gear I just used a RC helicopter training kit that consist of a round bracket attached to the bottom deck, four carbon fiber rods and four (orange) ping-pong balls:

image

Please note that: although all the mechanical parts are from a 3Channel helicopter (Syma S001), you will need electronics from a 4Ch helicopter! The main reason for using a 3CH helicopter for mechanical part is because the bottom blade bracket was already fixed (3Ch helicopters have no swashplate):

image

 

It might be more economical to get a 4Ch helicopter (mainly for its electronics that support pitch & roll not just pitch as a 3Ch helicopter) and then just remove the servos and the swashplate and then fix the bottom blade bracket using screws and/or glue.  As I did in the photo below (E-Sky Big Lama parts shown):

image

 

As an alternative to fixing the bottom blade bracket, you can also get a fixed blade bracket from a 3CH helicopter – it must be same inner diameter as the one from your 4CH helicopter. The diameter of the outer drive shafts are typically 4mm ( and 5mm , 6mm and even 8mm for larger helicopters).

Esky helicopters are best to use in terms of electronics because they have standard signal RC protocols in their transmitter / receiver boards that you can tap-into to get the Pitch/Roll signals needed for the QuadHybrid controller board. Syma helicopters integrated boards are harder to hack into – however some people have managed to hack into them and reverse engineer the signals.

 

Conclusion: What are The Advantages and Disadvantages of the QuadHybrid Design over a traditional QuadCopter or a RC Helicopter

While building the QuadHybrid  I selected the best features of a quadcopter and a helicopter and put them together, this resulted in a machine that took the best of the two worlds:

– QuadHybrid is mechanically symmetrical and stable. As opposed to a QuadCopter it does not rely on sensor to achieve this, the main hovering stability comes from the co-axial design and the centrifugal momentum of the fly-bar (the black bar on top of the blades with two weights on each side) – this is basically the same principle at work as in a mechanical gyroscope.

– QuadHybrid only requires two lifting “powerful” motors, the other 4 small motors are used for steering and are not crucial for device stability. There’s no need for motors to be brushless, and no need for brushless ESC controllers, they can be cheap RC-type brushed motors that can be driven by MOSFETs or transistors, there’s no need to reverse rotation of any motors, however it will be a feature in V2 of the controller board. Also there’s no need for CW and CCW propellers for the motors mounted on arms. All this vastly reduces the complexity and cost of the design.

– Partial or complete failure of any motor will still keep device in the air and give the operator/program a good chance to land it safely. In the worst case scenario – if a driving motor fails , the device will loose lifting power and will spin in the air, but will still at least stay on it’s vertical axis. In case of a quadcopter – failure of any motor is fatal – it will basically flip the quadcopter, or make it fly sideways with great chance to hit something. This is of course debatable, but in any case statistics tells us that the probability of one of the 4 motors to fail is twice of that of one of the two motors to fail (and economics tells us it’s also cheaper to get two motors than four).  Failure of any arm-mounted motor on a QuadHybrid is not critical, the device will still hover in the air and can be landed safely.

– Safety (we all know it should be first). A QuadCopter without  shielded high-powered rotors is a pretty dangerous device,  its propellers are spinning with an incredible force and are ready to cut into anything that falls in their way – they can do a lot of damage to humans, pets or property. QuadHybrid only has four low-powered motors on its arms since they are only used for steering, not lifting. The center driving propellers on a QuadHybrid are shielded away by its arms, also they have a folding design, so if they hit something it will somewhat make the impact less destructive.  Overall QuadHybrid is more suitable for indoor applications such as schools , universities or research facilities. Make no mistake though – QuadHybrid  can  still do damage and safety procedures must he observed at all times !

Few advantages of Quadcopters over QuadHybrid worth mentioning may be:

– because they have four powerful motors, Quadcopters  have greater lifting power. However this is more of a “brute-force” advantage – one could always get more powerful motors and battery for a QuadHybrid to achieve the desired lift power.

– Quadcopters can do some serious aerobatics (if you’re a good pilot)  including fly upside down or do 3D stunts. This is not really an advantage for some people, specifically when you are actually trying to build a nice and stable robotic platform – on the contrary it’s more something you try to avoid. 

In conclusion: although this first version of QuadHybrid was not designed to do 3D stunts or fly with high speeds –  it has a great hovering and maneuvering stability. I think it will find most of its use as a highly stable and controllable indoor flying robotic platform. However similar spin-offs could be expected to be developed for flying outdoors and/or with higher speeds.

 

//starlino//

This article is dedicated to all my math and science teachers !

Trickster Mouse Emulator – April Fools Day Practical Joke

Trickster is a simple application built on UsbThumb platform. It tricks your victim into thinking they have a virus on their computer, by hardware emulating and moving their mouse in circles on intermittent intervals.

Read More »

Use your TV Remote To Turn On Your Computer

Demo

Read More »